![]() I am a big believer in Forums such as these as they a great way for us all to learn. I hope I am just missing something as this seems to be a simple, and probably common, scenario. DesignWave/ProDeskTop also has face mating capability, but with a bit more freedom, at least from what I can see so far. Having said that, I have seen many different methods of mating parts, some good some not so good. Imate Supply Inc was founded in 2007, and is located at 15302 Valley Blvd in City Of Industry. ![]() I have used and helped design a number of CAD/CAM packages and I am a big proponent of OnShape. I still have a copy of DesignWave, which was created by ComputerVision and then became ProDeskTop when PTC bought ComputerVision. I am an old CAD guy with over 21 years in the CAD business, 14 of which were with ComputerVision Corp. In addition, I need to be able to position it vertically using either dimensions or some other connector so it is basically in the center of the runner. Shop by category, part number or serial number to find the parts you need to repair and maintain your equipment. Basically, I need to simulate real life, in that I would put one face against one of the runners, then slide it until it hit the other face of the second runner. Search and buy Cat parts for your equipment. My issue is that I can't find a mate connector that will allow me to mate the 2 faces and position the piece correctly. Secondly, I did make only one instance of this wedge shape and I am attempting to assemble it in an assembly. It's called Plant Stand and any of you are welcome to have a look at it. Just like us, plants also have different body parts: roots, stem, leaves. Thank you everyone for your input so far. Labels the parts of the plants in the images given below. Sorry for all the words, but this is an important topic This 'can' be slightly simpler faster in some situations, but the main limiting factor becomes motion - motion is what assemblies are for and so there would still be the process of importing the parts into an assembly and mating them. Find their customers, contact information, and details on 27 shipments. ![]() The benefit of only building one instance of each part and then assembling them in an assembly is that i am not wasting time/effort designing the same part over and over in the part studio.Ĭounterpoint: you could build a layout sketch in a single part studio and build all the parts in that environment. We continue to grow exponentially in this sphere courtesy our high level of comprehending client and customer requirements and new demands in an ever changing manufacturing world. ![]() The benefit of using a single part studio, is that i can create interpart relationships (a change in a notch on one part propagates to a tab on the mating parts). iMate Engineering Private Ltd incepted in the year 2011 specializes in the manufacturing of high quality precision-machined parts and machining services. Once the parts were designed, i would reference them in an assembly and build them there. Personally, i would use a single part studio to make one of each part - essentially one corner of this design. Matthew - the answer to your question depends on what feels natural to you. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |